Describe a
change that you think would improve your local area/
Describe
a law about the environment that you would like to see
Describe a change that
you think would improve your local area
You
should say:
- What local area
- What change
- How the change could be made
- And explain how this change would be an improvement to your local area
Describe a law about
the environment that you would like to see
You should say:
- What the law would be about
- How the law would work
- What effects this law would have (=what changes would result from this law)
- And explain why you would like to see this law in existence or why you think this law is needed
Answer:
I moved to Hanoi when I
was studying at high school, and have been here for 11 years. I have watched
this city develop from a small town and grow into a modern metropolitan area in
the new era. The city’s environment has become significantly
polluted due to the skyrocketing population
of recent years. As a result, I think the Government must enact
immediately some environmental laws to solve this problem.
First problem needed
to solve is that, people throw rubbish anywhere
anytime in the street. Chairman of Hanoi
People’s Committee should consider putting more trash bins out in the city so that people will place their waste in right location.
In addition, the city police should heavily fine those
who are caught littering the streets. By doing so, not
only could we enhance the awareness of citizens
but we could also improve the surrounding public scenery.
Secondly, the
authorities should run a campaign to propagandize and educate
people on how to classify and separate garbage
before throwing it out. Waste segregation can improves worker safety and efficiency
by reducing heavy lifting of garbage bags and
number of trips to the garbage dumpster.
In my opinion, although
these above actions are minor, they would
contribute to diminishing the impact of pollution in
our local area if they were done on a collective level
(07/11/2015) Whether or not someone
achieves their aims is mostly by a question of luck.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It
is argued that some people’s
success is mostly attributable to
luck instead of their own hard work.
However, I completely disagree with this opinion
I
believe that only determined and industrious people will be successful in whatever
they do. People working
hard usually attain
their goals. For instance, Bill Gate and his partners spent
thousands of hours coding and experimenting to bring out the great Window
operating system that we use nowadays. Another clear case of
success through determination is Leo Messi, an Argentine
professional footballer who was diagnosed
with a Growth hormone
deficiency as a child. Despite being injury-prone during his early career, he made
his competitive debut aged 17 in October 2004 and established himself as an integral player for the
club within the next three years, finishing 2007 as a finalist for
both the Ballon d'Or and FIFA World Player of the Year award, a feat he repeated the
following year.
On the other hand, by
contrast, luck is only a small factor in determining one’s achievement. Firstly,
people cannot solely
be dependent
on luck to become successful. If a student does not study for an exam, chances
are he or she will fail, no matter how lucky he or she may be. Secondly, luck
only contributes to short-term fortune. For instance, a person who wins a lottery is definitely
lucky because winning a lottery does not require you to do anything to earn it.
It purely depends on luck; yet, he or she cannot win the lottery for the rest
of his or her life
In conclusion, for
the reasons I have mentioned above, I strongly believe that in order to achieve
goals in life, one must be extremely determined and hard-working to follow his
or her passion
till the end.
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét